FUJITSU IX500 Scansnap Document Scanner (PA03656-B305-R) - (Renewed),Black. If you're like me, you probably still have years' worth of unscanned slides and negatives waiting to be tended to some rainy day, and a COVID lockdown gives you a golden opportunity.Best Mac Photo Editing Software - Free/Trial or Cheap Most free photo editors available on the App Store are quite basic, offering just a limited number of filters and allowing you to easily and quickly liven up your photos before posting them on social media.Fujitsu ScanSnap iX1500 Color Duplex Document Scanner with Touch Screen for Mac and PC Current Model, 2018 Release 4.5 out of 5 stars 1,330. A difficult 2020 that has blended into a difficult 2021 has made it harder for many of us to get outside and shoot, but that doesn't mean you have to neglect your photography. Launched by us in 2013 as Pic Scanner, this was the world’s first app for scanning and auto-cropping multiple photos at a time. Scan both family photos and documents Identify relatives in photos that will automatically attach to family tree App works without internet Install: iOS, Android.Some choices feel odd, though: For example it won't allow you to simply scan a standard JPEG.SilverFast's user interface is packed with buttons and controls, not all of them intuitively named or labeled. WorkFlowPilot only allows single-photo scanning, and takes you through the process step by step. SilverFast is powerful, but overly dense and confusingSilverFast has only two operating modes: WorkflowPilot or Manual. For example, no matter how I configured Windows' resolution and scaling, its un-resizable configuration dialog overflowed its borders, preventing me from being able to do things like reset app defaults.Overall, it's reasonably usable but not great. And it's also sometimes a little buggy.
Best Photo Scanning Software 2018 Manuals And NumerousThis was my least-favorite interface of the bunch. Help is provided throughout, but the many (and often redundant) buttons linking to abbreviated PDF manuals and numerous lengthy tutorial videos make its interface even more cluttered.I also found it prone to making me wait for preview scans more than its rivals, and cancelling a batch scan can be extremely tedious as it makes you separately cancel every remaining frame, one by one. Button colors vary for no logical reason, and active functions are indicated only with a tiny red dot.But Epson Scan's fixed crop for batch scanning threw away a significant amount of image data. With that proviso, I found Epson Scan had a slight edge in scanning speed, but with a significant catch.Epson Scan took just under 59 minutes to scan 18 negatives at 6400 dpi with dust reduction and sharpening active, while VueScan took 67 minutes, and SilverFast trailed the pack at 84 minutes. Epson is fastest, but there's a catchPerformance will, obviously, vary depending both on the speed of your scanner, and what hardware features it offers. Its single PDF user manual is also unusually detailed and helpful.This is hands-down my favorite of the trio. It's cleaner, faster and more modern than its rivals, and leaves more room to preview your images. It's the cleanest and most responsive of the bunch.VueScan's UI has Basic, Standard or Professional modes, all three mostly using drop-down lists very logically arranged in two to five tabs. Dvd authoring for macAnd Epson Scan was the least flexible, preventing you from batch-scanning unless you're willing to live with its automatically-selected cropping.I did find VueScan's enabled-by-default "multi outline" option a bit confusing, though. Significant manual tweaking is needed for all three programs if you want accurate cropping.Although I found its cropping setup the best overall, I still thought VueScan could use improvement both in its frame detection and its somewhat confusing default UI.VueScan's much more responsive interface made those adjustments easier than its rivals, though. SilverFast sometimes incorrectly rotated frames, too. All three apps could use more accurate croppingWhile Epson Scan's auto-cropping was by far the least accurate of the bunch, routinely discarding 10-15% of the frame height, I was surprised to find both SilverFast and VueScan also struggled to accurately detect frame sizes, as well.Both apps mostly got the frame height in the ballpark, but had some issues detecting the gaps between frames. SilverFast managed only 11.5 Megapixels/minute, making it by far the slowest. SilverFast trails both its rivals by some distance.Calculating backwards from the image dimensions as scanned, Epson Scan managed around 14.8 Megapixels/minute, just fractionally faster than VueScan's 14.5 Megapixels/minute. Unlike Epson Scan, it allows the film type to be selected for better results, but has a shorter list of film types than does VueScan. But VueScan and Epson Scan's images can easily be unsharp-masked post capture or the default sharpening levels tweaked similarly.All three programs can give good color with some work, but I found SilverFast needed tweaking more often than its rivals, tending to yield results that were too warm and with purplish casts, even with its color-cast reduction and orange mask expansion enabled. In all three cases, sharpening and IR dust reduction were enabled.SilverFast definitely defaults to significantly higher levels of sharpening than its rivals, though, giving the impression of more detail. In the 100% crops below, note the pale horizontal lines are fine water droplets misted from a garden hose just out of frame right.Perhaps not surprisingly, given they're all constrained by the same scanner hardware, all three programs turn in a very similar result in terms of their rendering of fine detail. Similar levels of detail, but SilverFast has higher default sharpeningOne of my first attempts at a still life as a teenager now makes for a rather nice gauge of detail. How did they perform in terms of image quality? We'll start out with detail levels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorFernando ArchivesCategories |